legaljustice4john.com
The Shaken Baby Syndrome Myth
renamed "Abusive Head Trauma" or "Non-Accidental Injury"

WAS

SBS: EVERTHING IS BROKEN

* SBS began as an unproven theory and medical opinions, now discredited by biomechanical engineering studies
* No DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS done to eliminate other causes, abuse assumed without evidence
* Shaken Baby diagnostic symptoms not caused by shaking
* Child protective agencies snatch children, destroy families based on medical accusations without proof of wrong-doing
*Poor or deceptive police investigations, falsified reports, perjured testimony threaten legal rights, due process
* Prosecutors seek "victory", over justice; defense attorneys guilty of ineffective counsel, ignorance, lack of effort
* Care-takers threatened, manipulated, in order to force plea bargains, false confessions
* A fractured criminal justice system--a big piece for the rich, a small piece for the poor, and none for alleged SBS cases.

1. SBS "MYTH" WEBSITE SUMMARY 
2. ARTICLE ABOUT PEDIATRIC ACADEMY SBS FRAUD

3. SUMMARIZED HISTORY OF THE SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME THEORY
4. POLICE ASSAULT: PROTESTING FOR A POLYGRAPH --DJT


Related websites/ important people and projects ShakenBabySyndrome/Vaccines/YurkoProject
CHRISTINA ENGLAND: BOOK
"Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis-- Are Parents Being Falsely Accused?" by Dr Harold Buttram, with Christina England (WEBSITE)
Evidence Based Medicine and Social Investigation:
EBMSI conferences, resources and information Articles and Reports
VacTruth: Jeffry Aufderheide; The SBS conection and other dangerous or deadly side effects of vaccination 

Vaccinefraud.com/The true, suppressed history of the smallpox vaccine fraud and other books:
Patrick Jordan
On SBS:
Sue Luttner, must-read articles and information on Shaken Baby Syndrome: her resources link
The Amanda Truth Project: Amanda's mother speaks out at symposium
Tonya Sadowsky


SUBJECT: WRONGLY CONVICTED--HOW INVESTIGATIONS
AND INTERROGATIONS GO WRONG

  1. The John Laverty-Baby Casey Investigation goes wrong from the beginning
  2. How investigations and interrogations go wrong
  3. Shaken Baby Syndrome, Abusive Head Trauma, and Actual Innocence Getting It Right

1.) In the John Laverty investigation, a pediatrician got revenge on an angry, disgusted, untrusting, confrontational father by accusing him of child abuse, altering a clinic record and writing a false report. Two more doctors falsified reports. All of the doctors misdiagnosed symptoms of illness for signs of abuse. The lead investigator withheld exculpatory evidence, misdirected the investigation to hide information favorable to the suspects, falsified his police report and gave perjured testimony in court. Two more investigators falsifed their reports, and one of them gave false testimony in court. The forensic officer falsified his report and someone switched forensic photos. A prosecutor withheld evidence. The PSI writer repeated false information, contradicted himself or herself (unreadable signature) and presented opinion as fact. A court clerk neglected to give defense lawyers information critical to their defense and derailed a trial, and the judge made grave errors. Added to that, the defense attorney lied to his client, failed to study the case and provided no defense, and those are just the highlights of a case gone terribly wrong.


2.)  HOW INVESTIGATIONS AND INTERROGATIONS GO WRONG

http://tinyurl.com/bsuhjr    (the yellow highlights are from key words used in a Google search)

 


3.)    http://medicalmisdiagnosisresearch.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/shaken-baby-syndrome-abusive-head-trauma-and-actual-innocence-getting-it-right/
Shaken Baby Syndrome, Abusive Head Trauma, and Actual Innocence Getting It Right

Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1195 
Full Report http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2048374#captchaSection

Abstract:
In the past decade, the existence of shaken baby syndrome (SBS) has been called into serious question by biomechanical studies, the medical and legal literature, and the media. As a result of these questions, SBS has been renamed abusive head trauma (AHT). This is, however, primarily a terminological shift: like SBS, AHT refers to the two-part hypothesis that one can reliably diagnose shaking or abuse from three internal findings (subdural hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhage and encephalopathy) and that one can identify the perpetrator based on the onset of symptoms. Over the past decade, we have learned that this hypothesis fits poorly with the anatomy and physiology of the infant brain, that there are many natural and accidental causes for these findings, and that the onset of symptoms does not reliably indicate timing. In the last issue of this journal, Dr. Sandeep Narang marshaled the arguments and evidence that he believes support the diagnostic specificity of the medical signs that are used to diagnose SBS/AHT. Dr. Narang does not dispute the alternative diagnoses but nonetheless argues that, in the absence of a proven alternative, the SBS/AHT hypothesis is sufficiently reliable to support criminal convictions. The cited studies do not, however, support this position since they assume the validity of the hypothesis without examining it and classify cases accordingly, often without considering alternative diagnoses. To address this problem, Dr. Narang argues that, in diagnosing SBS/AHT, we should rely on the judgment of child abuse pediatricians and other clinicians who endorse the hypothesis. Reliance on groups that endorse a particular hypothesis is, however, antithetical to evidence-based medicine and Daubert, which require an objective assessment of the scientific evidence. In the past decades, thousands of parents and caretakers have been accused “and many convicted” of abusing children based on a hypothesis that is not scientifically supported. While we must do everything in our power to protect children, we must refrain from invoking abuse as a default diagnosis for medical findings that are complex, poorly understood and have a wide range of causes, some doubtlessly yet unknown. To this end, we are calling for collaboration between the medical and legal communities for the sole purpose of “getting it right.”


Dianne Jacobs Thompson  Est. 2007
Also http://truthquest2.com (alternative medicine featuring drugless cancer treatments)
Author publication: NEXUS MAGAZINE "Seawater--A Safe Blood Plasma Substitute?"